Is Golf Architecture Art, Science, or Just Simple Problem Solving?

For the Spring 2006 International Network of Golf conference, I led a round table discussion entitled, Is Golf Architecture Art, Science, or Just Simple Problem Solving? The attendees at the table were very interested in what it was like to be a golf course architect and that is how the discussion actually ensued. Although we never specifically discussed the art versus science versus problem-solving issue, a general discussion touched upon this thesis in many ways.

The typical questions I am asked usually begin with, “How do I compete with the big names?” In answering that question we broke down the different types of golf course architects that practice and in what applications do the many different styles of architecture work.

Another inevitable question is, “What is your design philosophy”. The answer to that question led us in many different directions and touched upon the usual technology question and how equipment advances have affected design. The important answer to that question is that it doesn’t affect the everyday player and that I do not design for the 1% of players that all design and technology controversies center around.

In discussing philosophy, I included a quick history of golf course strategy and laid out the differences between strategic, penal, and heroic design schools of thought. We also discussed the effect that green speeds have on the game today and how the need for renovation based upon maintenance improvements evolved from an historical standpoint.