Blind Golf Holes
To See or Not to See
Society has certain disdain for what cannot be seen -- the future, a dark alleyway or a blind golf hole.
A blind golf hole is one on which interference of topographical
features such as ridges, hills or mounds prohibit a golfer from
determining a proper line of sight to a target on one or more shots.
From a golf course design slant, it creates excitement, challenge and
mystery.
Contrary to public perception, Pete Dye did not
invent blind golf holes to wreak havoc and instill complete
disorientation to high-handicappers. Early golf courses, be they of
sandy linksland or parkland composition, followed the natural lay of
the land. The first golf course architects did not have the advantage
of large earthmoving equipment that has become so much a staple of a
modern architect's repertoire. Thus, existing ridges and dunes became
natural hazards that architects incorporated into their routings to
play over, around and through, producing occasional blind occurrences.
Golfers accepted this as the "rub of the green" and relied on a sense
of feel and an increased concentration to overcome these hazards.
Blind holes also arose though a common theory of late 19th century that
water artificially applied to turf was unhealthy to grass. Greens were
thought to be better located on sandy soils, which meant it was unwise
to locate green sites on high, exposed areas for fear of erosion.
Hence, the golf course architect often located greens in hollows where
good turf already existed and where rainwater settled. This resulted
in punchbowl greens and blind approaches.
As technology
changed, so did golf course design, and the blind shot was virtually
eliminated from modern courses. But Dye was not ready to sacrifice
compelling design characteristics because some golfers believe blind
shots are dangerous or unfair. Dye originally agreed that blind holes
didn't belong in golf, until he met Tommy Armour. When Dye told the
Silver Scot his feelings, Armour responded bluntly, "That shows how
much you know about the game of golf"
Armour's opinion,
simply stated, is that "A blind hole is only blind if a golfer wants,"
meaning only once is a golf hole blind, providing a golfer has any
ability or recall at all. Armour reasons that blind shots stir up
emotions that affect a golfer's game, enhancing the mental aspect.
Dye has since become one of the game's biggest advocates of blind
holes. "I simply build blind holes to maintain some diversity," he
says. "This is just one more aspect of golf. Most of the land I
encounter is quite flat and lifeless, so I've had to create some blind
holes, usually short par-4s, requiring a half-wedge approach." Dye
likes to utilize design tactics to irritate talented golfers, thereby
distracting the golfer from making the lowest possible score.
One common thread to Dye's short, "blind" holes is that there is always
one point along the fairway where you can see the complete flagstick.
To successfully negotiate the hole, the golfer must find this point.
For example, the fifth hole at Long Cove Club on Hilton Head Island,
S.C., is only 317 yards long, with quite an ample landing area off the
tee. The green is hidden by large mounds and pot bunkers and protected
by water to the left. The preferred shot is a daring 7-iron off the
tee as close to the water on the left as possible. At that point, the
golfer is left with a view to the pine and most of the green 150 yards
away.
(On the other hand, in the 1991 USGA Mid-Amateur, Jim
Stuart birdied the fifth hole in medal play as well as in the
quarterfinals and semifinals en route to winning the championship. His
preference off the tee was along-iron to the right, followed by a
wedge. Stuart's game-plan was to take the water out of play.)
The master architect of Augusta National, Alister MacKenzie, took
strategic golf course golf course design to heights previously
unexplored. His aversion toward blind holes is reflective of his
expertise in strategic concepts. MacKenzie felt blind holes were
unnatural and should rarely be permitted. In a discussion of ideal
holes in 1920, MacKenzie stated that blind greens, blind bunkers and
blind approaches are not the kinds of difficulties which make for
interesting golf. "The greater the experience the writer has of
designing golf courses," said MacKenzie, "the more certain he is that
blindness of all kinds should be avoided. The only form of blind of
blindness that should ever be permitted is the full shot up to a green
whose position is accurately located by surrounding sandhills. Even in
a hole of this kind, it is not the blindness that is interesting, but
the visibility of the surrounding sandhills. At the Maiden Hole at
Sandwich (the sixth at England's Royal St. George's), it was the
grandeur and the impressiveness of the Maiden that made it a good hole,
and not the blindness of the green."
MacKenzie further
observed: "There may be a certain amount of pleasurable excitement in
running up to the top of a hillock in hopes of seeing your ball near
the flag, but this kind of thing gets rather tired as one gets older."
An interesting aside is that for all of MacKenzie's professed
abhorrence for blind situations, he was enamored with the Old Course at
St. Andrews, with its profusion of blind hazards, to say nothing of the
occasional blind shot, such as the tee shot at the 17th, the Road Hole.
Dye's need to create diversity on uninspired land is just one reason
why today's architect may endorse an occasional blind hole. A golf
course routing is a large puzzle, and if one piece is altered, all the
pieces around it may be affected. In many cases, an architect must
make concessions such as blind shots to overcome this challenge. The
occasional blind hole may also provide an architect with the chance to
create many excellent shots or holes based on the existing topography.
Favoring the inclusion of a blind hole may reduce earthmoving and other
construction costs as well as preserve wetlands and other wildlife
habitats.
Aside from Dye, though, blind holes are largely a
thing of the past. Rees Jones eliminated many such holes at U.S. Open
layouts such as Hazeltine National and Congressional Country Club.
"Definition helps the golfer conceptualize his or her shot quickly,
which in turn improves speed of play as well as safety concerns," says
Jones. As a player, though, he fully enjoys the challenge a blind hole
offers.
Many blind golf holes have had a great influence on
the history of golf. Bobby Jones' tee shot on the 11th at Merion in
the 1930 U.S. Amateur was hit to the left off the tee to an area just
right of Cobb's Creek, which isn't visible from the tee. The safe shot
is to the right of the blind fairway. A high pitch 20 feet from the
hole and two putts later, Jones' historic Grand Slam was clinched.
Jack Nicklaus' favorite hole in all of golf is the eighth at Pebble
Beach Golf Links. The tee shot is completely blind as one must aim at
a far-off chimney. After bogeying this hole on Thursday, Jack made par
the rest of the week as he went on to capture the 1972 U.S. Open.
The Olympic Club in San Francisco, site of many U.S. Open upsets, has
many greens where the putting surface is completely blind from the
approach. One such hole, the short, par-three 15th was certainly kind
to Scott Simpson at the 1987 Open. Despite only seeing the top of the
flagstick from the tee, he obviously knew his target well, birdieing
the hole each day to beat Tom Watson for the Open title by one stroke.
Jack Fleck birdied No. 15 in the fourth round of the 1955 U.S. Open,
which helped earn him a playoff berth against Ben Hogan, which he won,
in one of golf history's most shocking upsets. Unfortunately, the hole
produced the opposite for Arnold Palmer. The King bogeyed 15 in a
back-nine collapse which gave Billy Casper a victory in the 1966 Open.
Golf course architects must strive to rekindle the elements of mystery
and excitement in the game of golf. Fair, creative blind holes can be
well designed utilizing proper design principles and honest shot
values. Let's Question MacKenzie's contention that blind holes are a
novelty which become tiresome with age. Does the pleasure of racing
over a hill, hoping to confirm confidence in one's feel and
concentration by finding a ball close to the flagstick really lose its
luster over time? The challenge of overcoming previous failures,
knowing you may succeed the next time always keeps one coming back.
Just another fascination of the great game of golf.
Originally published in the 1996 March issue of Links Magazine.
« By RMGA